As explained in this post, I’m making the following changes to the FRT:
Injection 0 — Establish tree stewardship and revision protocol
The group creates a lightweight but explicit process for maintaining the LTP trees as living documents.
It includes:
- version history
- change proposals
- objection logging
- evidence standards
- decision rules
- unresolved minority reports
- review cadence
- named but accountable stewards
- criteria for “good enough for provisional use”
Future Reality logic:
Injection 0 exists
↓
Participants know how to challenge and improve the trees
↓
The trees become shared inquiry artifacts rather than one person’s strategic doctrine
↓
Objections are metabolized rather than ignored or personalized
↓
The group can provisionally trust the trees enough to use them
↓
Throughput can be defined in relation to a validated goal structure
↓
The rest of the PRT dependency chain becomes safer to execute.