# 2R Future Reality Tree: What to Change to?

**URL:** https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/t/2r-future-reality-tree-what-to-change-to/749
**Category:** Research and Sense-Making
**Tags:** discussion
**Created:** [June 5, 2026, 5:04pm UTC](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/t/2r-future-reality-tree-what-to-change-to/749 "2026-06-05T17:04:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dvdjsph](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/user_avatar/forum.secondrenaissance.net/dvdjsph/32/946_2.png) [@dvdjsph](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/u/dvdjsph)
#### Post date: [June 8, 2026, 8:51pm UTC](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/t/2r-future-reality-tree-what-to-change-to/749/4 "2026-06-08T20:51:07Z")

</div>

As explained in this post, I’m making the following changes to the FRT:

> [@2R Prerequisite Tree: How to Cause the Change?](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/t/2r-prerequisite-tree-how-to-cause-the-change/750/4):
>
> I agree, and I see this as a good thing. It’s akin to the tension one feels when asked “well, what does this positive change you’d like to see actually look like practically? How would you know it when it happens?” The fact that this dependency chain exists means it puts some burden on us (or at least those of us who find value in this methodology) to address this as the primary bottleneck. And yet, ruminating on this very point has led me to reconsider whether this dependency chain is well…

### Injection 0 — Establish tree stewardship and revision protocol

The group creates a lightweight but explicit process for maintaining the LTP trees as living documents.

It includes:

- version history
- change proposals
- objection logging
- evidence standards
- decision rules
- unresolved minority reports
- review cadence
- named but accountable stewards
- criteria for “good enough for provisional use”

Future Reality logic:

Injection 0 exists  
↓  
Participants know how to challenge and improve the trees  
↓  
The trees become shared inquiry artifacts rather than one person’s strategic doctrine  
↓  
Objections are metabolized rather than ignored or personalized  
↓  
The group can provisionally trust the trees enough to use them  
↓  
Throughput can be defined in relation to a validated goal structure  
↓  
The rest of the PRT dependency chain becomes safer to execute.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.secondrenaissance.net/t/2r-future-reality-tree-what-to-change-to/749)._