Mind and Cosmos. A summary courtesy of ChatGPT - General - Second Renaissance Forum
Research like Radin’s isn’t what convinced me. It was first person experience. Not a rational argument.
Me too. But the rational argument was required before I was able to believe such things were even possible, and without that belief then they actually aren’t possible. You have to believe they are possible or they won’t happen. They do not happen to skeptics.
Seems like a pretty extreme position to take. You’re saying most of the scientific community will be more convinced by rational arguments for what goes beyond their current frameworks than empirical arguments? My experience with those who are scientifically inclined has been the opposite. No one has time for a rational argument, and very few people give a fuck.
Seriously: Mind and Cosmos. A summary courtesy of ChatGPT - General - Second Renaissance Forum