A UTOK (informed) Cosmic Psycheology

General
,
1

Baron Short is one of the UTOK seed group for “psycheology”. Psycheology is the latest wrinkle in the UTOK system and was a centerpiece in the recent UTOK consciousness conference. Posted here (with Baron’s permission) to explore potential resonance with other authors and ideas influential for readers here.

A UTOK (informed) Cosmic Psycheology
Awakening as the Cosmos Through the Psyche

I. Introduction: The Question of Who We Are
Who are we, really? Are we just biological organisms driven by survival instincts, or are we participants in a deeper drama—one where consciousness and cosmos are not separate? This chapter introduces cosmic psycheology, a framework that unites objective science, subjective consciousness, and intersubjective culture in a living vision of human identity and potential. This multi-knowledge vector and the term psycheology is informed and inspired by unified theory of knowledge (UTOK), which we will discuss.
Quite simply, we are not merely in the universe. We are of it, and through us, the universe begins to know itself more fully. This matters and can change our personal experience of being alive, our goals, and collective cooperation.

II. Cosmos: The Matrix of Becoming
The cosmos is not a static collection of objects but a dynamic process of unfolding—an evolving, self-organizing whole. From quantum fluctuations to galaxies, from biogenesis to civilization, reality expresses nested layers of complexity.
In this view:
• Matter forms the base layer of being—atoms, molecules, stars, planets.
• Life emerges as organized systems with self-preserving functions.
• Mind emerges from life, bringing feeling, intention, and experience.
• Culture emerges from mind, enabling language, meaning, and history.
These four layers—Matter, Life, Mind, and Culture—are not separate realms but entangled strata of a single evolving cosmos. Humans stand at the cusp of these layers, holding the paradox of being both an organism and an awareness of the whole. These planes of complexification are discussed in detail in UTOK, specifically the tree of knowledge that aligns the matter, life, mind, and culture with the human sciences for each corresponding level (physics-matter, biology-life, mind-psychology, and culture-sociology.)

III. Psyche: The Mirror of Interior Cosmos

The psyche is the interior, experiential dimension of the cosmos arising through you as you. It is the domain of experience—of perception, memory, emotion, selfhood, and meaning. Just as the physical cosmos has structure and evolution, so does the psyche.
• At its base, the psyche is embodied—grounded in sensations, instincts, and emotions.
• It grows through narrative—ego and persona, the storied self.
• It can transcend into the transpersonal—experiences of unity, purpose, and pure awareness.
Psyche is not confined to the individual. Relationships, culture, and collective symbols inhabit shared spaces of meaning. The cosmos does not merely give rise to psyche—it is psyche, subjectively mirrored in every point of awareness.

IV. Psycheology: The Study and Practice of Living Interiorly
Psycheology is more than psychology. It is the integrated study and transformation of interiority—one that includes traditional psychological insight but also spiritual realization, developmental models, and cosmic context.
Whereas psychology often limits itself to the mental behavior and its pathologies, psycheology explores:
• Awareness as ground: not a mental object, but the field in which all experience arises.
• Development as trajectory: from reactive ego to integrated, transpersonal being.
• Purpose as emergence: a life lived not just to survive, but to serve the deeper unfolding of love, truth, and creativity.
Psycheology offers a map and method for aligning the self with the whole.

V. We Are a Nested Node in the Cosmos Looking at Itself
From a systems perspective, each person is a nested node as process in the matrix of becoming—an intersection of energy, information, and planes of complexification that give rise to the emergence of awareness through complex forms.
We are:
• Biologically shaped by 13.8 billion years of cosmic and planetary evolution.
• Psychologically conditioned by personal history, trauma, and cultural programming.
• Existentially free to awaken to our role as participants in a conscious cosmos.

Objectively, we are stardust emergently organized into life, minded animals with neurons, and culture persons with narratives. Subjectively, we can become conscious of that reality and reorient our identity from isolated ego to cosmic participant.
Carl Sagan’s insight becomes literal: “We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.” The twist in cosmic psycheology is that we are also a way for it to feel itself, care for itself, and choose its next evolutionary steps.

VI. The Obstacle and the Opening: Loving Awareness
Despite this cosmic potential, most of us live contracted—bound by the small self. Fear, reactivity, habit, and cultural fragmentation veil our deeper nature.
The core obstacle is forgetfulness—a forgetting of the deeper awareness that is always present, always loving, always whole.
But we can remember.
Through contemplative practices, inquiry, community, and authentic living, we can remove the veil. We can rediscover the ground of being as loving awareness—a luminous field of consciousness that is:
• Spacious: not entangled in mental noise.
• Peaceful: not reactive or grasping.
• Unconditionally accepting: seeing all with compassion.
• Impersonal yet intimate: not “mine,” but always here.
When this loving awareness is reclaimed, it flows into all aspects of psyche—healing wounds, reorienting purpose, and expanding identity.

VII. From Finite to Infinite: Extending the Game of Life
Once we remember who we are—not just as individuals, but as cosmic expressions—the game changes.
No longer is life merely about personal success, status, or security. The finite game (defined by winning) gets contextualized within the infinite game (defined by continued play, growth, and emergence).
We begin to care:
• Not just for ourselves and our families,
• Not just for our in-group or nation,
• But for all life, all humanity, and the future of consciousness itself.
This is the psycheological reorientation—a shift from egoic survival to planetary and cosmic stewardship. We begin to live not just for what we can get, but for what we can give to the long arc of existence. This comes through not only objectively understanding what we are, but subjectively feeling the peace, freedom, and love of consciousness and letting this radically reorient the psyche, our relationships, and activities.

VIII. Conclusion: A New Identity, A New Civilization
Cosmic psycheology reveals that we are not just minds within bodies, or souls waiting for an afterlife. We are psyche within cosmos—and cosmos awakening through psyche.
This new vision is not a belief, but a lived knowing: that who we are is inseparable from what reality is becoming.
And from this knowing, a new kind of civilization can emerge—one not built on fear and domination, but on awareness, love, and shared participation in the infinite unfolding.
The cosmos plays through us. Let us play well.

1 Like
2

Such realisations are only truly grasped outside of the system that oppressed them.
You can skim and sketch them, certainly. You can even pass them on in the manner of a blind person describing colours - a kind of theoretical, vaguely grasped, collection of notions. But to SEE them, to know them… how can that be possible through the frameworks and filters of western civilisation? Even the word civilisation is a misnomer, because what it actually resembles is more akin to a virus - characterised by unchecked consumption and extraction of energy/resources from its host.
Since this is global, and we are all to a degree linked to it - even agents for it (if unintentionally), the only manner to approach such truths is through finding the scattered remnants of ancient wisdom - practices such as deep meditation, mantras, ceremonies of movement and sound, and use of plant medicines that break down the cemented lenses that constrain our perception.

3

Direct seeing or intuition requires dispensing with cognitive frameworks in general. That’s a basic mystical insight at the bottom of any number of contemplative practices. However, a conversation (like this one) requires language, so we must make do for that purpose with what is available. I’m understanding Baron’s use of “civilization” in the OP as meaning something like “large scale social organization”. Is there a better term for that?

4

Yes, that’s fair—language is the necessary veil we speak through, even when we know it occludes as much as it reveals. And I agree, direct seeing bypasses cognitive frameworks entirely. But what I’d add is this: not all frameworks are equally obscuring. It may also be a case that someone can utilise the tools and methodologies I noted alongside such exchanges.

Western civilisation—if we accept “large-scale social organisation” as its neutral definition—has been shaped by systems that actively displace and discredit other ways of knowing. It’s not just a framework among many; it’s a framework that has made itself imperial. That’s why I hesitate to use “civilisation” without qualification. It implies something advanced or ordered, when in practice, much of what we call civilisation has been extractive, homogenising, and traumatising.

So perhaps what we need is a term that doesn’t centre scale or system, but relationship. Something like “culture of entanglement” or “web-based societies”—words that gesture not toward bigness or hierarchy, but toward coherence, reciprocity, and embeddedness. Or we could even look to natural healthy ecosystems, which are based on cyclical exchanges, of zero waste, cooperation and symbiosis.

5

If humanity enjoys a good long run beyond the current generation, I imagine historians of the future might bracket the “civilization era” as one phase of human evolution, a phase with a beginning, middle, and end. Presumably we are nearing the end, of at least the end of the “unchecked consumption and extraction of energy/resources” phase.

Whether or not future scholarship wants to use the term “civilization” for any large-scale, technically-informed human society, it is very arguable that “western civilization” may have ended already. In a recent scholarly essay, the author argued that the term “western civilization” did not emerge until Europeans began to lose confidence that 19th century European culture represented the apex of civilization itself. WWI and WWII underlined those premonitions of decline. The US appropriated “western civilization” in the 1950s as a Cold War rallying cry, but elite US education lost interest in the idea in the 1980s, seeing globalization as the roadmap to the future. (A neoliberal, corporately colonizing, “end of history” sort of globalization to be sure).

David Wilkinson prefers the term “central civilization” for the complex of technologies and power formations that spawned in Egypt and Mesopotamia and circled the globe during the European colonial era. (Note that China, India, and Islam made very significant contributions to the technology and science behind European colonialism. In many ways they got many of their best ideas served back to them in new packaging).

In the current situation, it’s difficult to frame items like the US president dressing himself up as pope on social media as anything other then cultural decline. Whatever is going on which such juvenile postering, “civilization” is not the first term that comes to mind. But critical technologies like AI, drones, robotics, missiles, satellites, etc. are thoroughly global, so it’s hard to point to any given nation or culture as being the central locus of the current version of central civilization. If there is a center to it, the center is really more of a meshed network that embraces the entire globe.

With respect to Second Renaissance, the term “Renaissance” implies a recovery of something valuable from the past. What might that be? My preferred answer to that question is pre-industrial traditions from all over the world. As to whether the resulting sensibilities will be post-civilizational or just post- this particular version of civilization I leave it to future generations to decide.

6

Our analysis aligns well, but diverges insofar as I don’t share the notion of a linear (albeit comforting) progression for civilisation. My perspective is one of ongoing cycles of development, then collapse. And here you may even agree, but then where we diverge (and like most others here, it seems) is civilisation - using that term very generously - is heading for, or indeed in the midst of, a catastrophic collapse, one that will make previous ones seem quite mild in comparison. And actually this process is necessary for the renaissance we speak of - without it, whatever occurs will just be reformations of the system, which retain the same underlying foundations. The question for me is: what exactly will it look like? Many with this ‘collapse acceptance’ see something quite dark, even the end to humanity in entirety. But there is a window whereby something better could be created. Whether that will be a kind of tribal patchwork of localised communities, or a regional larger collective that retains the technology we know to functional levels, I don’t know. Things become less certain the longer we look ahead. Although ultimately even with a perfect biosphere and eco-civilisation, habitable conditions on Earth will end. Though many find it meaningless to look that far ahead, it becomes more relevant under the cosmic psycheology framework you expound. Humanity, in theory, could ‘steward’ life and expand it to other worlds. But doing this positively requires a complete cognitive revolution that discards almost everything we’ve been taught, and practice.

7

The book by Ian Morris described in this article is the best I’ve found to analyze past patterns empirically. (See the second chart in the article especially).

The collapse cycle perspective is illustrated by the decline of both Rome and Han China after the 1st century CE. Note China recovered more quickly, but collapsed again after the Song. However, there is also a more long term secular growth pattern overall. I would attribute that to civilizations expanding frontiers and launching new versions of themselves on their edges. The area for civilization in general just got larger over time. The recent spike in global social development is due to what Nate Hagens calls the carbon pulse. As goes cheap energy, so goes high tech civilization. So a large magnitude collapse is certainly one future potential.

1 Like