Multipolar Trap

Seemingly identical to a [[Collective action problem]] (aka coordination problem / free-rider problem etc), it is a multi-person prisoner’s dilemma, tragedy of the commons etc. Especially used for these showing up in a broader societal and political context.

Original source (see below) seems to be Meditations on Moloch where you have the following near the top:

It’s easy enough to imagine such a state. Imagine a country with two rules: first, every person must spend eight hours a day giving themselves strong electric shocks. Second, if anyone fails to follow a rule (including this one), or speaks out against it, or fails to enforce it, all citizens must unite to kill that person. Suppose these rules were well-enough established by tradition that everyone expected them to be enforced.

So you shock yourself for eight hours a day, because you know if you don’t everyone else will kill you, because if they don’t, everyone else will kill ‘‘them’’, and so on. Every single citizen hates the system, but for lack of a good coordination mechanism it endures. From a god’s-eye-view, we can optimize the system to “everyone agrees to stop doing this at once”, but no one within the system is able to effect the transition without great risk to themselves.

And okay, this example is kind of contrived. So let’s run through – let’s say ten – real world examples of similar multipolar traps to really hammer in how important this is. [emphasis added]

As can be seen by the context, a multi-polar trap is simply a classic collective action problem aka prisoner-dilemma type issue – the example he has just given is precisely a classic prisoner-dilemma example, albeit a multi-person version with a very dramatic story. Furthermore, the following examples he gives are all collective action problems e.g. a collective fishing situation with externalities etc.

Other usage and examples that people are also confused why invent a new term for an existing concept

See e.g. discussion in https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/3vcrbb/whats_a_multipolar_trap/

Or https://conversational-leadership.net/glossary/ which states as follows and where the very next paragraph discusses the tragedy of the commons clearly indicating this is just a collective action problem (but given a new name).

The multipolar trap is a term used to describe a situation where self-interest compels multiple parties to act against their collective interest, leading to detrimental outcomes or even destruction.

Origin

AFAICT this term came from [[Slate Start Codex]]'s post [[Meditations on Moloch]] which is quite influential within the general space – I suspect this was many people’s introduction to collective action problems, free riding etc.

Commentary

Not really sure why this term is used rather than e.g. collective action problem?

[[Daniel Schmachtenberger]] often uses this term, but why he uses this rather than ”collective action problem” is unclear.

Multipolar trap does not even show up on Google ngrams relative to other terms:

[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Examples of inventing new terminology for existing concepts]]

The solution may be SIMPOL. The Simultaneous Policy Process. https://uk.simpol.org/

1 Like

I have personal experience of this on a very small (and I hope amusing) scale. For a short while I was a teacher at a girls school in Oxford. (Very small, secondary level.) It had a remarkably progressive approach to rules, with a school assembly to which the different years could propose changes to school rules. There had been various attempts to change the dress code rules to allow brown cord trousers, with no success because each attempt was rejected as an isolated minority proposal.

One day, if I recall correctly, one of the girls asked me about this. I suggested that the way to overcome the problem was to coordinate between the years, and all years to bring the same proposal to the same assembly. I had no idea of the machinations behind the scenes, but lo and behold at the next assembly that’s exactly what happened. And of course it worked!

2 Likes

Gen, I agree that SIMPOL’s model provides one practical model of how to address collective action problems on the national level, but it seems rather “thin” for addressing policy decision-making on the international/global level, which is why perhaps it has not done much to shift the ground in the 25 years since its founding in 2000. But perhaps this would be a great example to look at in more detail as a starting point for any deep dive into the kinds of questions Rufus seemed to be trying to open up last September. Again, another pitch for creating a tent for those interested in deep diving the discussion over collective action and the pivotal importance of addressing the “intermediate layer” for building any movement for paradigm change that could have planetary impact…

We have very recently initiated a different model in the Research Group called a “subcircle”. The original research calls on Fridays were a topic of the week format. The subcircle format, by contrast, involves repeated sessions on a more focused topic. I would love a subcircle on action models and the intermediate layer!