This thread pulls together a few others: AI, Vervaeke, wisdom, the crisis of culture in general. Pebble in the pond:
https://ethics.utoronto.ca/events/ethics-of-ai-in-context-john-vervaeke/
My original interest in Vervaeke’s work came from his unusual juxtaposition of the history of philosophy with computer science. That makes his work a deeper than usual jumping off point for discussions of AI and ethics. Hardly the final word, however (on either topic).
Note from this article above (also in reference to Anna Riedl’s recent preso) the situated subject is treated with some degree of suspicion. Whatever our current views are, they are assumed to be incomplete, self-deceptive, flawed in variety of ways. Recursive Relevance Realization needs to be recursive, because we are seeking wisdom, not possessing it in advance. Also - AI did not invent “hallucinations”. Plato, for example, noted those in the Cave. Cognitive science, in many ways, is the science of how we (human and machine) get things wrong and how to do better.