That should be a good thing.
You really drive some specificities in and insist they make all the difference - but to me they still don’t. I am happy with phenomenalism, panpsychism, transcendental idealism… and I don’t feel “the urge” to tie it up with quantum theory.
It is not about “urges”. It is about coherence. The more that is tied up, the more oomph it has to drive a paradigm shift through.
I’ll keep on trying to see what’s so special about your NED…
So you aren’t reading that other thread?
We have work to do - General - Second Renaissance Forum
You haven’t seen the post where ChatGPT rebuts its rebuttal? You can’t see anything special there? I think maybe you aren’t looking very hard. Either that, or you don’t understand what is being proposed.
I have provided an integrated theory which elegantly and efficiently solves a handful of the biggest mysteries in modern science, all in one go, and you think there’s nothing special about it?
Do you think there are loads of theories like this, that can solve all these mysteries together? There are none. Nobody has come up with anything like this before.
as with David, the main problem here seems to be incredulity.
Somebody was eventually going to figure out the solution to this conundrum – the key to the paradigm shift. Why not me?